Repository Planners: Please Comment on Comparative Evaluation of Repositories

From Siddharth Singh, Michael Witt, and Dorothea Salo

Madison, WI We are working on comparing four digital-repository software packages (DSpace, ePrints, Fedora, and Zentity) in hopes of helping libraries and other institutions select the most appropriate software for their requirements. Read more about our project at
http://blogs.lib.purdue.edu/rep/.

We invite anyone who has recently embarked upon planning for a digital repository to tell us what criteria were used to select a software package. (We are not interested in hosted repository services at this time, only repositories managed in-house.) Your input will inform our testing criteria.

Please leave your comments at
http://blogs.lib.purdue.edu/rep/2010/02/25/a-comparative-analysis-of-institutional-repository-software/. Pointers to public planning documents or lists of criteria are equally welcome. Though we will read all comments submitted, we plan to respond only by private email so as not to bias the public comment-stream.

Posted in Topics: DEV8D, DSpace, DSpace distribute, DuraCloud, DuraCloud distribute, DuraSpace, DuraSpace digest, Fedora Commons, Fedora Commons distribute, Fedora Repository, News, Open access, Open source, Preservation and archiving, Scholarly publishing, Technology, eResearch

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
Jump down to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment



* You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.